Lara Osborne
My feedback
4 results found
-
9 votes
FIrst we would like to say thank you to those that have taken the time to express their opinion on adding a “Waiting For” focus area as well as those who have voted for this change. We want you to know that we are listening. Our team has met and discussed your very valid points. We stand corrected and agree that adding a “Waiting For” focus area absolutely fits into David Allen’s methodology and it would enhance the functionality of our Get It Done app.
Our developers are currently working on this feature request and we will be sure to update you once we are ready to release the update.
We would like to clarify that in no way were we trying to increase our paid subscription plans by offering a workaround that is only included in our paid plans. We apologize if this is how our initial response was…An error occurred while saving the comment Lara Osborne
shared this idea
·
-
2 votesLara Osborne
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesLara Osborne
supported this idea
·
-
448 votesLara Osborne
supported this idea
·
Katherine, I'm very happy to revive and support your idea. Their rationale didn't make sense to me. It seems like a marketing ploy for a service that, as a self-employed person, I can't really use yet.
GTD has the Three Ds, three possible ways to deal with actionable items. Do, Delegate, Defer. That is the whole universe of possibilities when processing "stuff".
Delegate = Waiting For
Defer = Calendar and Next Actions
I'm surprised more people aren't frustrated by the lack of this core, central, essential component of the system.